Monday, December 14, 2009

Ricky Gervais and W.C. Fields - Connections Deeper Than Dentistry


The ability to create comedy is one of humanity's signature triumphs. And I am grateful that mankind also invented motion pictures (with and without sound) to capture humor and allow generations (both current and future) to enjoy it.

That said, let's jump way ahead to a particular pair of comedy movie stars - past and present.

From the past, one of my all time favorite comedians is W.C. Fields. Several books have been written about him and his uniquely caustic comic style, but there is no substitute for simply watching the man himself in action. So you should do so at your earliest opportunity!
Fields' characters tend to fall into distinct categories - including the flamboyant liar/braggart with a fondness for drink that has become his immortal stereotype (see "My Little Chickadee", "You Can't Cheat An Honest Man"). My fave "type" is the hen-pecked husband/father/son-in-law who is trying to survive a wickedly, often hilariously complex world (see "The Man On The Flying Trapeze", "It's A Gift", "You're Telling Me").

Another of Fields' types is the near-total misanthrope with a pulverizingly hilarious wit. This character roundly disdains most people, issuing devastating verbal asides muttered when the target is just out of earshot. And that's where Ricky Gervais steps in. The creator of "The Office" is in fine form in the extremely funny film "Ghost Town," playing a self-absorbed character immensely sure of his superiority even as his actions reveal the comic absurdity - and the emptiness - of that stance.

In "Ghost Town", Gervais plays a New York City dentist whose near-death experience enables him to see ghosts - and the spirits of Manhattan have a lot of unfinished issues that only a human partner can help them with. But their unwilling accomplice has built a life around denying other living people exist, let alone dead ones. How the dentist must connect with the undead to forge a path to a new life is the basic story, and offers Gervais playing the contemporary equivalent of a Fields film.

So how is Gervais' dentist - Bertram Pincus, a worthy nom de plume on par with Fields characters like J. Pinkerton Snoopington and Egbert Souse - channeling W.C.? It's in the way he casually tosses hilarious insults and routinely looks to gain the upper hand. Pincus will semi-gleefully cut in line to steal a taxi ride, and vacuously apologize while pushing the "close doors" button on the elevator while a package-laden woman runs to catch a lift, both bits recalling various Fields adventures in one-on-one exploitation. Gervais' style is more deadpan than W.C., but his gruff, comically acidic exterior hides a man seeking humanity (though on his own terms) in a fashion that is pure Fields. And both comics play characters that continue to fight their largely imaginary wars even as they ruefully acknowledge that defeat could be just around the corner.

Ultimately, it's seeing another average, slightly rounded, pasty-faced man with a withering wit in a dentist's smock that provides the most direct Gervais-Fields link. Fields made perhaps the greatest film on dentistry:"The Dentist" sharply skewers family issues, modern technology, golf and sex in a snappy twenty minutes. Seeing Gervais essay a Fieldsian comic style while wearing his professional uniform in many scenes outside the office is simultaneously reminiscent and pretty funny on its own ("I'm a dentist, I just came from work...this is how we do it, baby" he explains at one point).

Enough chatter. If you haven't seen "Ghost Town" with Ricky Gervais, go and rent it. And if you have not seen W.C. Fields, you've got a whole lot of catching up to do. Fortunately, in both cases, you'll have a great time.

Friday, December 4, 2009

C.I.A. Venture Capital, The Internet And You


In-Q-Tel's multiple investments spread across a wide range of technology companies.
Click below for the secret message!
I have a myspace page for music, a couple of photo site accounts and this blog, so my internet privacy is already hopelessly compromised. I made these choices knowing big-brother style monitoring - either for commercial/marketing gain or something more devious - was going on. But I’ve refrained from joining Facebook or any other social networking sites.

Aside from being basically anti-social, it's knowing that Congress - via the Patriot Act - gave up so many citizen privacy protections that tells me to keep a low profile. That doesn't seem to bother millions of Americans, though. That's why this recent press release was an attention-grabber.

Visible Technologies - a “social media monitoring” company - has joined up with In-Q-Tel to “listen” to consumers across a broad range of internet social networks. From the attached press release, highlights are mine:

In-Q-Tel is the not-for-profit, strategic investment firm that works to identify, adapt, and deliver innovative technology solutions to support the mission of the U.S. Intelligence Community. Launched by the CIA in 1999 as a private, independent organization, In-Q-Tel’s mission is to identify and partner with companies developing cutting-edge technologies that serve the national security interests of the United States.”
http://es-es.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=161002463047&comments&ref=mf

Our tax dollars at work – spying on us! If you've got a good surveillance idea, the C.I.A.'s In-Q-Tel has got the start-up dough! I know Facebook has a pretty wide-ranging “we can do what we want with your stuff for as long as we want, and give/sell your info to pretty much anybody - especially law enforcement” terms of service agreement – I don’t know much about any others. but all that fine print detail is just a few clicks away on the internet.

Myself, I think I’ll preserve whatever privacy I have left from the CIA’s investment firm as best I can. Although who's to say this blog entry isn't being read by deeply-hidden lurkers right now?

Here is the Visible Technologies website:
http://www.visibletechnologies.com/

Here is the In-Q-Tel website – I enjoyed the FAQ section on “Submitting A Business Plan” – hey, the CIA’s got unlimited venture capital:
http://www.iqt.org/

And two items in the “just for grins” department:

ISS: Intelligence Support Systems for Lawful Interception, Criminal Investigations and Intelligence Gathering
Check out this online security company’s conference agenda from last month. Clicking into the specific program topics is an eye-opening experience. While much of what’s being discussed here is lawful – meaning we’ve allowed the creation of laws to enable this sort of electronic monitoring – the scale is troubling. Not to mention the ongoing revolving door of lawmaking, policing, and surveillance/security equipment private enterprise that financially enriches all its participants.
http://www.issworldtraining.com/ISS_WASH/

And here's an ISS tidbit that just dropped: Sprint fielded 8 million law enforcement information requests over the last year!
http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/12/surveillance-shocker-sprint-received-8-million-law

And the Department of Defense is staging an internet treasure hunt! Only it’s not all fun and games :
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/dec/04/darpa-balloon-challenge

Wednesday, December 2, 2009

Letters To Washington


A copy of a letter sent to Representative Ed Perlmutter, my congressional district representative, on 12/2/09:

Representative Perlmutter:

I urge you to help stop this madness of ever-escalating war and empire in Iraq and Afghanistan. How many more soldiers have to die before you and your Congressional colleagues begin to shut down these wars of occupation?

How many more soldier's families have to suffer the loss or injury of a loved one? How many more innocent civilians have to die in Afghanistan? How much more money has to be spent, lining the pockets of multi-million dollar private contractors as they build the infrastructure to house the US military for a long-term presence in the region?

How can a Democratic majority, elected in 2006 to both houses with a mandate to end the wars, continue to vote to expand them instead? How can our country absorb the incredible financial, physical and psychological costs that endless wars bring? How do you think we'll manage it - I'm interested in your view, since you have repeatedly voted to continue these wars.

And as soon as someone in the government can tell me how Al-Qaeda was responsible for the destruction of World Trade Center 7 on September 11, 2001 - well, then maybe the other flimsy rationales offered by the President for expanding the wars will make sense.

Stand up and be counted on the side of sanity and peace, Mr. Perlmutter. The President's twisting of words to explain this "surge" is as dumbfounding and insulting as any mangling of the language used by Mr. Bush. Do not blindly support the President because he is a Democrat.

There are resolutions before the House now to stop funding this war - H.R. 3699 from Representative Barbara Lee is one such measure and I hope you will co-sign and champion it. The House has the power to stop the killing - please use it!

If not, I'd like to know how you sleep at night, knowing you have a direct hand in meting out unnecessary death and destruction that will affect - and haunt - generations of Americans, Afghans and Iraqis.

Same Old Story: But Now It's The Nobel Peace Prize Winner Who's Expanding The Wars

I would like to think I'll be able to retire this picture someday...but someday is not today.

I'm getting really tired of writing about the wars, but they keep going on, keep getting bigger, keep getting more and more of our tax dollars to pound down a Middle Eastern sinkhole. Except for the dollars that enrich the hundreds of thousands of private contractors and energy company operators.

That's why these wars will never end - too many people making too much money at the expense of soldiers and their families lives, and citizen tax dollars fuel the enterprise.

President Obama's speech on December 1st outlined his new plan to "surge" 30,000 more troops into Afghanistan. Yes, the Nobel Peace Prize winner is fulfilling his campaign promise to expand the US military presence in Afghanistan and continue the wars. Will Congress fight back this time?

They did not fight back against the Bush Administration war machine, even though by 2006 the Congressional Democrats could have severely hindered if not outright stopped the free-flowing money spigot required for endless war. So if they wouldn't stop their Republican political opponents, does anyone think they will stop their own party's leader?

A colleague at work told me of a Thanksgiving holiday encounter with a military officer relative just returned from a lengthy tour of duty in Iraq. "He says it's a joke over there" was the quote, and he recounted several examples related to him of excessive resource waste, luxury building materials, and unrestricted budgets available for the officer's duties. I urged him to watch Robert Greenwald's movie "Iraq For Sale" to get even more details. (http://iraqforsale.org/)

I think most people have the idea things in Iraq and Afghanistan are much different than they are portrayed in the American media. More folks need to understand that, and start hounding their congressional representatives to stop this fiscal/military madness. It's the only way this particular folly of empire can be halted.

Some other notable reactions:
From Cindy Sheehan, pointedly dead-on in her analysis, as usual - "You Get What You Vote For": http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article24089.htm

Blogger Arthur Silber expertly analyzes between the lines of the President's speech, pointing out that Obama has effectively gutted the anti-war movement, leaving an open field to continue the Bush Adminstration's war machine:

And Representative Dennis Kucinich uses just a few words to skewer the President's war plan - "What part of 'get out' do we not understand?"
http://www.kucinich.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=157597